CrowdCheck Blog
A while back, one of our favorite start-up clients called me and asked me to speak to a potential investor. Paul Efron, a resident of Arizona, wanted to invest in the company's Regulation A offering. However, when he went onto the company’s website to invest, his subscription was rejected. The company was accepting subscriptions from investors in every state but Arizona and Nebraska.
Why Arizona and Nebraska, asked Paul?
The reason was that while federal law and most states’ laws say that a…
This entry is filed under Capital Raising, Crowdfunding, Regulation, Regulation A, Securities Law, State Law
A while back, one of our favorite start-up clients called me and asked me to speak to a potential investor. Paul Efron, a resident of Arizona, wanted to invest in the company's Regulation A offering. However, when he went onto the company’s website to invest, his subscription was rejected. The company was accepting subscriptions from investors in every state but Arizona and Nebraska.
Why Arizona and Nebraska, asked Paul?
The reason was that while federal law and most states’ laws say that a…
This entry is filed under Capital Raising, Crowdfunding, Regulation, Regulation A, Securities Law, State Law
A while back, one of our favorite start-up clients called me and asked me to speak to a potential investor. Paul Efron, a resident of Arizona, wanted to invest in the company's Regulation A offering. However, when he went onto the company’s website to invest, his subscription was rejected. The company was accepting subscriptions from investors in every state but Arizona and Nebraska.
Why Arizona and Nebraska, asked Paul?
The reason was that while federal law and most states’ laws say that a…
This entry is filed under Capital Raising, Crowdfunding, Regulation, Regulation A, Securities Law, State Law
A while back, one of our favorite start-up clients called me and asked me to speak to a potential investor. Paul Efron, a resident of Arizona, wanted to invest in the company's Regulation A offering. However, when he went onto the company’s website to invest, his subscription was rejected. The company was accepting subscriptions from investors in every state but Arizona and Nebraska.
Why Arizona and Nebraska, asked Paul?
The reason was that while federal law and most states’ laws say that a…
This entry is filed under Capital Raising, Crowdfunding, Regulation, Regulation A, Securities Law, State Law
A while back, one of our favorite start-up clients called me and asked me to speak to a potential investor. Paul Efron, a resident of Arizona, wanted to invest in the company's Regulation A offering. However, when he went onto the company’s website to invest, his subscription was rejected. The company was accepting subscriptions from investors in every state but Arizona and Nebraska.
Why Arizona and Nebraska, asked Paul?
The reason was that while federal law and most states’ laws say that a…
This entry is filed under Capital Raising, Crowdfunding, Regulation, Regulation A, Securities Law, State Law
A while back, one of our favorite start-up clients called me and asked me to speak to a potential investor. Paul Efron, a resident of Arizona, wanted to invest in the company's Regulation A offering. However, when he went onto the company’s website to invest, his subscription was rejected. The company was accepting subscriptions from investors in every state but Arizona and Nebraska.
Why Arizona and Nebraska, asked Paul?
The reason was that while federal law and most states’ laws say that a…
This entry is filed under Capital Raising, Crowdfunding, Regulation, Regulation A, Securities Law, State Law
I have long (oh so long) been one of those urging the SEC to give some clarity with respect to the status of “finders.” See here for the latest piece.
Early-stage companies raising funds very often reach out to a guy who knows some guys who have money and have invested in startups in the past. If the first guy wants to be compensated by reference to the amount of money his contacts are able to invest, he may well have violated the broker registration requirements of the Securities Exchange Act…
This entry is filed under Capital Raising, Federal Law, Regulation, Regulation A, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), Securities Law
I have long (oh so long) been one of those urging the SEC to give some clarity with respect to the status of “finders.” See here for the latest piece.
Early-stage companies raising funds very often reach out to a guy who knows some guys who have money and have invested in startups in the past. If the first guy wants to be compensated by reference to the amount of money his contacts are able to invest, he may well have violated the broker registration requirements of the Securities Exchange Act…
This entry is filed under Capital Raising, Federal Law, Regulation, Regulation A, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), Securities Law
I have long (oh so long) been one of those urging the SEC to give some clarity with respect to the status of “finders.” See here for the latest piece.
Early-stage companies raising funds very often reach out to a guy who knows some guys who have money and have invested in startups in the past. If the first guy wants to be compensated by reference to the amount of money his contacts are able to invest, he may well have violated the broker registration requirements of the Securities Exchange Act…
This entry is filed under Capital Raising, Federal Law, Regulation, Regulation A, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), Securities Law
I have long (oh so long) been one of those urging the SEC to give some clarity with respect to the status of “finders.” See here for the latest piece.
Early-stage companies raising funds very often reach out to a guy who knows some guys who have money and have invested in startups in the past. If the first guy wants to be compensated by reference to the amount of money his contacts are able to invest, he may well have violated the broker registration requirements of the Securities Exchange Act…
This entry is filed under Capital Raising, Federal Law, Regulation, Regulation A, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(c), Securities Law