CrowdCheck Blog

For some reason, this issue has been coming up a lot lately. Our usual response to the question “Can non-US issuers make a Reg A or Reg CF offering?” is to point to the rules: Rule 251(b)(1) says Reg A can only be used by “an entity organized under the laws of the United States or Canada, or any State, Province, Territory or possession thereof, or the District of Columbia, with its principal place of business in the United States or Canada.” Reg CF Rule 100(b) says Reg CF may not be used by any…

For some reason, this issue has been coming up a lot lately. Our usual response to the question “Can non-US issuers make a Reg A or Reg CF offering?” is to point to the rules: Rule 251(b)(1) says Reg A can only be used by “an entity organized under the laws of the United States or Canada, or any State, Province, Territory or possession thereof, or the District of Columbia, with its principal place of business in the United States or Canada.” Reg CF Rule 100(b) says Reg CF may not be used by any…

For some reason, this issue has been coming up a lot lately. Our usual response to the question “Can non-US issuers make a Reg A or Reg CF offering?” is to point to the rules: Rule 251(b)(1) says Reg A can only be used by “an entity organized under the laws of the United States or Canada, or any State, Province, Territory or possession thereof, or the District of Columbia, with its principal place of business in the United States or Canada.” Reg CF Rule 100(b) says Reg CF may not be used by any…

For some reason, this issue has been coming up a lot lately. Our usual response to the question “Can non-US issuers make a Reg A or Reg CF offering?” is to point to the rules: Rule 251(b)(1) says Reg A can only be used by “an entity organized under the laws of the United States or Canada, or any State, Province, Territory or possession thereof, or the District of Columbia, with its principal place of business in the United States or Canada.” Reg CF Rule 100(b) says Reg CF may not be used by any…

For some reason, this issue has been coming up a lot lately. Our usual response to the question “Can non-US issuers make a Reg A or Reg CF offering?” is to point to the rules: Rule 251(b)(1) says Reg A can only be used by “an entity organized under the laws of the United States or Canada, or any State, Province, Territory or possession thereof, or the District of Columbia, with its principal place of business in the United States or Canada.” Reg CF Rule 100(b) says Reg CF may not be used by any…

For some reason, this issue has been coming up a lot lately. Our usual response to the question “Can non-US issuers make a Reg A or Reg CF offering?” is to point to the rules: Rule 251(b)(1) says Reg A can only be used by “an entity organized under the laws of the United States or Canada, or any State, Province, Territory or possession thereof, or the District of Columbia, with its principal place of business in the United States or Canada.” Reg CF Rule 100(b) says Reg CF may not be used by any…

For some reason, this issue has been coming up a lot lately. Our usual response to the question “Can non-US issuers make a Reg A or Reg CF offering?” is to point to the rules: Rule 251(b)(1) says Reg A can only be used by “an entity organized under the laws of the United States or Canada, or any State, Province, Territory or possession thereof, or the District of Columbia, with its principal place of business in the United States or Canada.” Reg CF Rule 100(b) says Reg CF may not be used by any…

One aspect of Regulation A that does not seem to be getting the attention it should is the fact that it facilitates investment into things other than the future performance of early-stage companies. Real estate is an obvious alternative to early-stage equity. Even where the real estate project has not been built out yet, real estate investments (which may be REITs or other real estate funds) promise investments that have an earlier time horizon, in some cases more liquidity and in many cases…

One aspect of Regulation A that does not seem to be getting the attention it should is the fact that it facilitates investment into things other than the future performance of early-stage companies. Real estate is an obvious alternative to early-stage equity. Even where the real estate project has not been built out yet, real estate investments (which may be REITs or other real estate funds) promise investments that have an earlier time horizon, in some cases more liquidity and in many cases…

One aspect of Regulation A that does not seem to be getting the attention it should is the fact that it facilitates investment into things other than the future performance of early-stage companies. Real estate is an obvious alternative to early-stage equity. Even where the real estate project has not been built out yet, real estate investments (which may be REITs or other real estate funds) promise investments that have an earlier time horizon, in some cases more liquidity and in many cases…