CrowdCheck Blog
We’ve had this question come up a couple of times in recent deals, so it’s worth flagging. Under Regulation A, you can have offering statements in effect (and thus offerings open) for more than a year (they can even last three years under certain circumstances). However, if your continuous offering is going to last more than a year, at least once a year you have to file a post-qualification amendment (PQA) to “refresh” the offering statement. This is required by Rule 252(f)(2)(i), which says:…
This entry is filed under Capital Raising, Disclosure, Federal Law, Financial Statements, Regulation, Regulation A
We’ve had this question come up a couple of times in recent deals, so it’s worth flagging. Under Regulation A, you can have offering statements in effect (and thus offerings open) for more than a year (they can even last three years under certain circumstances). However, if your continuous offering is going to last more than a year, at least once a year you have to file a post-qualification amendment (PQA) to “refresh” the offering statement. This is required by Rule 252(f)(2)(i), which says:…
This entry is filed under Capital Raising, Disclosure, Federal Law, Financial Statements, Regulation, Regulation A
We’ve had this question come up a couple of times in recent deals, so it’s worth flagging. Under Regulation A, you can have offering statements in effect (and thus offerings open) for more than a year (they can even last three years under certain circumstances). However, if your continuous offering is going to last more than a year, at least once a year you have to file a post-qualification amendment (PQA) to “refresh” the offering statement. This is required by Rule 252(f)(2)(i), which says:…
This entry is filed under Capital Raising, Disclosure, Federal Law, Financial Statements, Regulation, Regulation A
We’ve had this question come up a couple of times in recent deals, so it’s worth flagging. Under Regulation A, you can have offering statements in effect (and thus offerings open) for more than a year (they can even last three years under certain circumstances). However, if your continuous offering is going to last more than a year, at least once a year you have to file a post-qualification amendment (PQA) to “refresh” the offering statement. This is required by Rule 252(f)(2)(i), which says:…
This entry is filed under Capital Raising, Disclosure, Federal Law, Financial Statements, Regulation, Regulation A
We’ve had this question come up a couple of times in recent deals, so it’s worth flagging. Under Regulation A, you can have offering statements in effect (and thus offerings open) for more than a year (they can even last three years under certain circumstances). However, if your continuous offering is going to last more than a year, at least once a year you have to file a post-qualification amendment (PQA) to “refresh” the offering statement. This is required by Rule 252(f)(2)(i), which says:…
This entry is filed under Capital Raising, Disclosure, Federal Law, Financial Statements, Regulation, Regulation A
We’ve had this question come up a couple of times in recent deals, so it’s worth flagging. Under Regulation A, you can have offering statements in effect (and thus offerings open) for more than a year (they can even last three years under certain circumstances). However, if your continuous offering is going to last more than a year, at least once a year you have to file a post-qualification amendment (PQA) to “refresh” the offering statement. This is required by Rule 252(f)(2)(i), which says:…
This entry is filed under Capital Raising, Disclosure, Federal Law, Financial Statements, Regulation, Regulation A
Following our update in March of this year, the Nebraska legislature has taken action to provide an exception to the requirement for a company to register as an issuer-dealer in the state when making offers and sales of securities under Tier 2 of Regulation A so long as no commission or other remuneration is paid for soliciting investors. We have also included a new section regarding state review of notice filings and the content of the Regulation A offering statement under their anti-fraud…
This entry is filed under Capital Raising, Regulation A, Securities Law, State Law
Following our update in March of this year, the Nebraska legislature has taken action to provide an exception to the requirement for a company to register as an issuer-dealer in the state when making offers and sales of securities under Tier 2 of Regulation A so long as no commission or other remuneration is paid for soliciting investors. We have also included a new section regarding state review of notice filings and the content of the Regulation A offering statement under their anti-fraud…
This entry is filed under Capital Raising, Regulation A, Securities Law, State Law
Following our update in March of this year, the Nebraska legislature has taken action to provide an exception to the requirement for a company to register as an issuer-dealer in the state when making offers and sales of securities under Tier 2 of Regulation A so long as no commission or other remuneration is paid for soliciting investors. We have also included a new section regarding state review of notice filings and the content of the Regulation A offering statement under their anti-fraud…
This entry is filed under Capital Raising, Regulation A, Securities Law, State Law
Following our update in March of this year, the Nebraska legislature has taken action to provide an exception to the requirement for a company to register as an issuer-dealer in the state when making offers and sales of securities under Tier 2 of Regulation A so long as no commission or other remuneration is paid for soliciting investors. We have also included a new section regarding state review of notice filings and the content of the Regulation A offering statement under their anti-fraud…
This entry is filed under Capital Raising, Regulation A, Securities Law, State Law